A year ago, I posted these 33 theses on the doors of Dodger Thoughts. Let’s see how they have held up …
Thesis | Result | Comment |
---|---|---|
1) Frank McCourt will prevail in the courts against Jamie McCourt and retain ownership of the Dodgers. | No | Failed to anticipate the Great Adverb Dispute. |
2) Rather then sell the team, McCourt will take on a minority partner to improve his cash flow. | TBD | It might not be quite that simple. |
3) The incentive for the minority partner will be the Dodgers’ ability to make a profit, with potential for greater revenue from development of the Dodger Stadium property. | TBD | This plus the TV contract. |
4) The project to turn the area behind center field into a gathering place of restaurants, shops and a Dodger museum will begin by 2015. | TBD | I sure was looking ahead, wasn’t I? |
5) The Dodgers will earn enough money over the coming decade to remain competitive, though they will never spend like the Yankees or Red Sox. | TBD | Fans are probably pessimistic about this one, but we’ll see. |
6) The Dodgers will sign a veteran with an unexciting name to take the No. 4 spot in the 2010 starting rotation, completing their offseason in much the same manner they would have even if the McCourts weren’t divorcing. | Yes | Hello, Vicente Padilla. |
7) Observers will decry the state of Dodger starting pitching entering the season, even though it will probably match up well with every team in the National League West except San Francisco. (Arizona’s No. 4 starter: Ian Kennedy?) | No | San Diego ruined this prediction for me. |
8) The focus will be on what the Dodgers didn’t do, ignoring how thin the pitching market was and how little their division rivals have improved themselves. | Yes | This was a safe one. |
9) Spring training will come as a relief, as the conversation returns to baseball and, despite all that has happened, the sight of Matt Kemp and Clayton Kershaw roaming the field becomes too intoxicating to resist. | Yes | Spring Training was relatively enjoyable this year. |
10) Exhibition performances will excessively color people’s views of the coming season, even though Val Pascucci’s .429 batting average in March 2009 failed to carry over into the regular season. | Yes | This at least applied to the Dodgers themselves, vis a vis Les Ortizables. |
11) Sportswriters will blast the Dodgers for not acquiring a big name, then criticize every move Manny Ramirez makes while knocking the Dodgers for all the money spilling out to Andruw Jones, Juan Pierre and Jason Schmidt. | Kind of | Not all sportswriters, but certainly some I can think of. |
12) People will be intrigued with how Russell Martin explains that this will be the season everything will be OK for him. | No | “Intrigued” seems strong in retrospect, plus Martin got hurt in March. |
13) Chad Billingsley will gamely turn the other cheek as reporters and fans insultingly question his manhood. Then he’ll go out and throw bullets. | Yes | He wasn’t red-hot to start the season, but ultimately this came true. |
14) The Dodgers will not get off to as hot a start in 2010 as they did in 2009, when they were 10-3 and 21-8. | Yes | To say the least … |
15) The Dodger community will be on edge, as it becomes clear to all that 2010, like most years, will be a season-long challenge. | Yes | To say the least … |
16) Jokes about portable concession stands will grow old fast, yet continue to be told. | No | This died down more quickly than I expected. |
17) Lines at Dodger Stadium food stands will remain long anyway. | Yes | No change here. |
18) Nevertheless, the Dodgers will remain in the thick of the National League West race into May, when the McCourt case launches in the courts. | Yes/no | Dodgers had the best record in the NL at one point, but the trial was delayed. |
19) The free-for-all between the McCourts’ lawyers will be annoying beyond belief. | Yes | All those fun revelations and accusations … |
20) Kershaw, Kemp or Andre Ethier will suffer a setback, while Martin, James Loney or Rafael Furcal will experience a rebirth. | Yes | Setback for Kemp, rebirth for Furcal (until he got hurt, but I’m counting it). |
21) Ramirez will have his ups and downs but will regain some of the fans he lost in the final months of 2009. | No | I could probably prove this true on a technicality, but I won’t try to push this one through. |
22) There won’t be as much Dodger walk-off magic in 2010 as there was in 2009. | Yes | There was some moments early on, but they didn’t carry on. |
23) Forced to rely on the farm system for pitching depth, the Dodgers will benefit from some precocious performances. | Yes | John Ely, Carlos Monasterios and Kenley Jansen, among others, did some good for the team. |
24) “Don’t Stop Believin'” will be gone, but “God Bless America” will return. | No/yes | Oh well. |
25) With the dust from the courtroom settled, the Dodgers will make a trading deadline deal. | No/yes | Deals came while dust was still swirling. |
26) The biggest moment of the year will be when Vin Scully announces his plans for 2011. | Yes | You can argue with me, but I’m counting this one. |
27) With almost nowhere to go but down after two National League Championship Series appearances, 2010 will almost surely end as a disappointment for the Dodgers. | Yes | This had a chance to be wrong in summertime, but in the end it was right. |
28) The Phillies will not win the NL title, because it looks too much like they should. | Yes | That’s the way it goes … |
29) The Dodgers will have more reason to be nervous after the 2010 season, when the team has to replace Ramirez and Hiroki Kuroda while giving even bigger pay raises to the homegrown talent — even those who had subpar years. | Yes | Even though Kuroda and others are back, if we’re talking about how most people felt at the end of the 2010 season, there was more nervousness and pessimism than 2009. |
30) Minor league pitchers Aaron Miller, Chris Withrow and John Ely will come to the rescue, sooner or later, either by becoming major-league ready or major-league trading chips. | No | Given the way Ely ended the season, it’s hard to tally this one in the Yes column. |
31) The Dodgers will have enough talent to stay competitive, but not enough to make them prohibitive favorites. | Yes | I’ll probably get some heckles on this one, but if the 2010 Giants could win, I’m not ruling out the 2011 Dodgers. |
32) The Dodgers will continue to be good enough to keep all but the most reactionary fans hooked, yet weak enough to keep all but the most tolerant fans unsatisfied. | Yes | Accurate, no? |
33) Fans will start to pay attention to the ticking clock that is the end of the 2012 season, when Martin, Loney, Kemp, Ethier and Billingsley are scheduled to become eligible for free agency. | No | I’m not sure enough people are worried about this. |
Total | 19-7-7 | What does this mean? I have no idea. |
Comments are closed.