I wrote about the new Jackie Robinson film “42” for Sports on Earth. Ultimately, I enjoyed the experience even as I was disappointed by it.
For an even saltier take on the movie, here’s Scott Foundas’ review for Variety.
I wrote about the new Jackie Robinson film “42” for Sports on Earth. Ultimately, I enjoyed the experience even as I was disappointed by it.
For an even saltier take on the movie, here’s Scott Foundas’ review for Variety.
Comments are closed.
What happens when three old friends in crisis fall into an unexpected love triangle? In The Catch, Maya, Henry and Daniel embark upon an emotional journey that forces them to confront unresolved pain, present-day traumas and powerful desires, leading them to question the very meaning of love and fulfillment. The Catch tells a tale of ordinary people seeking the extraordinary – or, if that’s asking too much, some damn peace of mind.
Brothers in Arms excerpt: Fernando Valenzuela
October 22, 2024
Catch ‘The Catch,’ the new novel by Jon Weisman!
November 1, 2023
A new beginning with the Dodgers
August 31, 2023
Fernando Valenzuela: Ranking the games that defined the legend
August 7, 2023
Interview: Ken Gurnick
on Ron Cey and writing
about the Dodgers
June 25, 2023
Thank You For Not ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
1991-2013
Dodgers at home: 1,028-812 (.558695)
When Jon attended: 338-267 (.558677)*
When Jon didn’t: 695-554 (.556)
* includes road games attended
2013
Dodgers at home: 51-35 (.593)
When Jon attended: 5-2 (.714)
When Jon didn’t: 46-33 (.582)
Note: I got so busy working for the Dodgers that in 2014, I stopped keeping track, much to my regret.
Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén
Onlyatriple
Very insightful review, thanks Jon. So your sense is that the film is suitable for a 9 year old boy? a 6 year old? My kids are very eager to see it, but I wonder if this is the best way to introduce them to the issue of racial prejudice. Or maybe it is exactly the right way.
Jon Weisman
The language is extremely harsh, so you’d have to prepare. I’d say no to a 6 year old. For age 9, I think with a preparatory conversation you could do it.
I did see Blazing Saddles at age 7 without any prep, and they were throwing the n-word around a bit on that movie. But this is a different movie and a different era.
Onlyatriple
Ah, Blazing Saddles. Watching the campfire scene with my mom was one of the truly embarrassing moments of my childhood. And one of the funniest.
Anonymous
So what did a 7 year old make of Madeline Kahn?
Jon Weisman
She could be appreciated at any age :)
Jack Dawkins
It’s twoo, it’s twoo!
Jon Weisman
NPUT
Anonymous
Broad is underselling it. I thought the movie was a 75-mph fastball down the middle, plodding and obvious, with characters as one-dimensional as a foul line.