[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HC4bf67s5lQ&w=550&h=309]
By Jon Weisman
I’m guilty of a lot of preemptive worry about my job. It’s something that I’m actively trying to fight. It’s not that it doesn’t have its purpose — if I didn’t worry at all about making sure everything got done, deadlines would come and absolutely smack me in the face.
But there’s another level to it, a level where I find I struggle to relax until everything is done — except that everything is never done. There’s always something.
Plus, there’s the humbling frustration that however much I plan, some things still might not turn out the way I hoped. I do believe Vin Scully has a favorite line about this.
In the scattered moments — and I did have one Sunday, coincidentally around the time the Dodgers were losing 5-3 to Arizona — where I exhale and accept that although there’s more to do tomorrow, I’ve done about as much as I can or need to today, life can feel pretty good. That good feeling can be transient, just as the anxious feeling can. But there’s no denying that when you’re stressed, the good feeling is a feeling worth having.
* * *
So the Dodgers are 23-22 in 2014. Average, mediocre, disappointing. More recently, they’ve lost three of their past four, or seven of their past 11, or 10 of their past 16, opening the pathway from disappointing to anxiety-inducing. Many Dodger fans are nervous, many are angry. People want explanations. They want remedies. They want heads to roll.
One explanation is that this is simply not a consistently sharp fielding team. It never shaped up to be a consistently sharp fielding team during Spring Training, and it might never become one. It will win on the nights when the fielding is sharp (being inconsistent means you execute some of the time, not none of the time), or when the team hits and pitches well enough to overcome any fielding follies. Twenty-two times out of 25, this hasn’t happened.
That, to me, is by far the most logical explanation, and really, there’s not much more that needs to be said.
But inevitably — so inevitably that I’m always surprised when some act as if this were unique to a particular team like the 2014 Dodgers — when a team is average, mediocre or disappointing, fans and the media will comment that the team is playing with no energy or emotion. I’ve lost count of how many times I’ve heard or read this in May.
It might or might not be true, but it’s fascinating (not in a good way) the cocksureness that people make this comment just from observing the action on the field, which is the only evidence most people get. Every once in a while, you’ll see a ballplayer dog it running to first on a routine grounder or backing up a potential bad throw. But really, on almost every single moment at a baseball game, there’s no way you can see that a player isn’t doing everything he is capable of.
Not succeeding is not the same as not trying. Moreover, sometimes you can succeed without your maximum effort. Don’t tell me you never have. Yet you’ll never see anyone say “they’re playing with no heart” after a win. There’s this assumption of a clean, moral universe in sports and in baseball and with the Dodgers. If you’re winning, you did everything you could. If you’re losing, it’s a character flaw.
Can anyone, by any significant measure, demonstrate that the Dodgers who won 7-0 on Friday played the game with more energy than the Dodgers who lost 18-7 on Saturday? Surely, you’re not going to be the one to question Clayton Kershaw’s mental and emotional commitment to the game. Was it that the Dodgers played with no heart when they fell behind 9-2, then turned on the heart when they came back to 9-7 with the tying run at the plate, then — for no reason other than to vex us — picked that particular moment to become Grinches and give up nine more runs?
Or was it just a bad night, perhaps one to learn from, but not one of any philosophical significance?
If Matt Kemp’s bases-loaded line-drive in the eighth inning on Sunday finds an opening, everyone would be celebrating the character of this team instead of questioning it. Next time, I suppose, Kemp will have to equip his bat with a literal moral compass.
What’s funny is in one breath you’ll see people comment about the importance of a team’s heart, and in the next, you’ll hear wonderment that an expensive player payroll hasn’t guaranteed success and happiness. As if anyone ever thought money guaranteed success and happiness. Money is a tool, a very good tool, but it’s not the only tool.
* * *
So, back to preemptive worry. That’s what this is about.
You figure that if the Dodgers win 100 out of 162 games during the 2014 regular season, they would be guaranteed a playoff spot, if not the best record in the National League. Everyone would be happy. But for most fans, those 100 wins can’t come soon enough. Why not just get them done now?
Well, while no one in their right mind would believe it possible for the Dodgers to win their first 100 games, there is this temptation to feel that when they’re not winning, I would say, at least 60 percent of the time, that something is deeply wrong.
One of my best friends in high school and college was, among other things, probably the smartest guy I ever met and definitely the most efficient student I ever knew. It wasn’t until we were roommates my senior year in college that I really understood how he did it. He would come back in the afternoon from his classes, go into his room and learn … everything. He was like Jim Carrey at the end of “The Truman Show,” actually reaching the end of a horizon previously assumed to be infinitely distant. He had both the ability and will to simply understand every single thing he needed to know, so that when it came time for a test or any other project, he could do absolutely everything he needed to do.
Then he would eat dinner and go out and get smashed.
This, essentially, is the baseball fan’s dream. Win everything, then party. Never lose. Meet adversity on purely procedural terms, like doing the dishes, rather than as a reality that will defeat you from time to time, sometimes unbearably often.
This, however, is not how it works for 99 percent of us, the Dodgers included, however much we might wish it otherwise. You’re never done churning. Sometimes, success comes late. In the best stories, it almost always does.
* * *
Let’s allow for the possibility — and again, I don’t really believe this is what’s happening — but let’s allow for the possibility that these current Dodgers really aren’t doing their best, that they’re consciously pacing or saving themselves, or that they’re unconsciously unable to produce at an elite level except in response to crisis. They are the fight-or-flight Dodgers.
They will ultimately be judged on results, but if they succeed, then maybe they will have had it right all along. Because I wouldn’t wish the destructive emotion of anxiety on anyone. And there’s a case to be made that the less mental energy the Dodgers expend in May, the more they’ll have in October.
Procrastinators are never role models, because of the deadline bogeyman. There’s always the sense of flirting with disaster, of asking for trouble and having nowhere to turn when it arrives. That doesn’t change the fact that sometimes, people who leave the hard work for the last minute do succeed (and keep in mind, mid-May is hardly the last minute, and a five-game deficit is hardly an enormous hole). We might resent the success of the procrastinator, even as we grudgingly have to respect it.
We can worry. Oh yes, we can worry. Or, we can understand that every season has its own ebb and flow, trust in the Dodgers to be the agents of their own change and convert our worry into hope.
Perhaps it’s my inability to apply this level of zen to my own work that makes me so believe in it it as a Dodger fan. Those who can’t do, talk about others doing. Each loss aggravates me, but all hail the next game.
I can’t really ask anyone to change what they feel. I can only tell you what I feel, which is that when the team I’m rooting for is losing, the best medicine isn’t to question their heart or wonder why they don’t play to their potential every day. It’s to sit back, put on “Rosalita” and look forward to tomorrow.
THE SPICY MEATBALL REPORT
Reblogged this on The Spicy Meatball Report and commented:
Jon Weisman, Dropping Science!
LCLA
Great stuff Jon! I’m finding myself missing more Dodgers games than I have in years. Half has to do with their performance and half with my own personal things. Hopefully they can get on a roll soon.
14hodges
This is vintage Jon Weisman. I had just been thinking that I missed your pieces like this one! The combination of perspective and hope regarding Dodger baseball and perspective and hope regarding the rest of life produces a beautiful, encouraging piece. Thank you! Jon, here’s to your capturing moments of that good feeling more often. And all hail the next game!
LCLA
Nicely put. Completely agree.
Charles Moehringer
I don’t think the players are lazy, dogging it, or not trying. However, this team is impatient at the plate, strikes out too much, makes too many errors (mainly physical errors), hardly ever plays “little ball” and the bullpen is mediocre at best. In my 50 years as a Dodger fan, I’ve never seen so much accomplish so little. Last year excessive injuries was a reasonable excuse – not so this year. I guess everyone’s waitiing for that 53-13 run like we had last year but that may not happen again.
Jon Weisman
I find it hard to believe that you’ve never seen a team more disappointing in Dodger history than the 23-22 Dodgers. I’m a fan for 40 years and I can certainly think of examples.
I also don’t think a team that leads the league in walks and stolen bases can be described as excessively impatient or one that never plays little ball.
scareduck
Certainly, some of the Darryl Strawberry teams might qualify. But I get Mr. Moehringer’s point, to the extent that the Dodgers, finally, belatedly, started spending like Yankees — at the exact moment that strategy now seems almost quaint. Not only are there too many variables money can’t fix, even the ability to actually put that kind of dough on the table is in question, at least in my mind. With 70% of the Los Angeles market blacked out from this mediocrity, the failure is both profound and perhaps, lasting. You think the majority holdouts are gonna pay the obscene prices the Dodgers brass negotiated with Time Warner? We could be here for years, while TW pays premium prices to the Dodgers for an audience that, by definition, isn’t present.
The stakes, I think, couldn’t be higher for the franchise.
Scott Griffee (@WDevil67)
“They don’t play little ball enough” – I recall Don getting routinely roasted last year for bunting. Dee bunts, the pitchers bunt, and in some cases with runners on 1st and 2nd and nobody out, someone else may bunt. that is good enough for me.
They do, on too many occasions, leave runners in scoring position. that isn’t necessarily lack of “little ball” but not driving in runs.
My take on the bullpen is that it will magically perform better once the starters routinely go 7+ innings and we stop playing so many extra inning games. The bullpen has logged too many innings, made too many pitches, and thus has had too many opportunities to “blow it”.
Michael Green
As the Mighty Thomas Boswell said of baseball, judge slowly. Even more slowly than that. It takes time. All things take time. Now, I could go on with a critique of the team, but I’ll leave it at this: Jon, if you aren’t certain of things at times, I got the yearbook and the first issue of the magazine last week, and you are doing an incredible job.
John Stodder Jr.
It’s the fielding and the bullpen. I have no complaints about the starting pitching or the lineup. Hitters go through streaks, hot and cold, and because they are 1/8, it is survivable. But when the bullpen goes through slumps, games are lost.
The problem this year is that so many fans are out of touch with seeing the team. Radio is only an option for oldsters — the young don’t get it. So the team is losing them. Maybe forever. Time for the Dodgers to fix the biggest mistake in their LA history and renegotiate the failed cable deal. The kind of engagement you demonstrate in this well-written piece is simply not available anymore to most fans, including me.
Scott Griffee (@WDevil67)
I concur on the TV aspect. People don’t listen to the radio. I actually enjoy it – I can cut the lawn, clean the garage, etc. AND follow the game.
Don’t get me wrong – I am missing watching the Dodgers something furious. I miss the “behind the scenes” stuff the new channel has. And I do believe interest in the Dodgers is waning in the city because most can’t see them live. But I do believe people will be back when/if a deal does get done. i remember after the last strike that some claimed baseball was dead, but we know that wasn’t true.
scareduck
I am missing nine innings of Vin Scully. Concur with John Stodder’s comment above.
Really good piece, Jon, and thanks for it.
Lastly, kind of missing the old Baseball Toaster crowd right about now.
John Stodder Jr.
The best fun of the Baseball Toaster era were those night when a gripping game was on and dozens of people were commenting hundreds of times. It was a different community than the kind that follow most Dodger blogs now — smarter, capable of complete sentences and subtle thoughts, witty more than snarky. But a key ingredient is, again, missing: Most of us can’t see the game now.
I don’t think that when they talk about the “two-screen experience,” which Jon pioneered, they meant the plastic cover of my Sony transistor.
I will probably become a more avid fan again if the TV deal is settled fairly soon. But if this is a lost season and if this ends up being Scully’s last season — to quote Don Corleone, “that I will not forgive.”
ZEKE
Thank you so much Jon! What a wonderful post. I have missed the dodgerthoughts Jon and reading this today made my day.
Petriello, Stephen, Moriyama, and the others do a fantastic job. But for many of us, you are our Dodgers muse.
Jon Weisman
I hope this doesn’t sound ungrateful, but the Dodger Thoughts Jon has not disappeared. :) He’s been here. It’s not like I wrote these kind of posts every day at DT. More often, I’ll concede. But click on the “Thinking Out Loud” tag for more.
artieboy
I liked what Vinny said after Uribe’s double clutch throw to first; “it’s not just the errors it’s the plays you fail to make.”
I think Dodger fans are smart enough to see that and have every right to be upset when the club fails to make those plays.
Maybe the adjective is the wrong one. But Vinny sees it and since we have learned the game through Vinny we also see it: lousy, embarrassing, clumsy baseball. Maybe things will change, just like last season….hopefully. At least it isn’t 1992 :)
artieboy
Just out of curiosity Jon, if not too intrusive, what ever happened to your friend, the smartest guy you ever met?
The smartest student I ever knew (straight A student, memorized the dictionary) ended up in federal prison.
Jon Weisman
He’s had a very successful career and family. No horror story.
oldbrooklynfan
A great article Jon, I just about agree with everything you wrote. It always bothered me when I read comments about how much effort the Dodgers are using in times like this when I know they’re trying their best all the time. I believe, this year in particular, after coming so close to winning the pennant last year, many fans expected they’d have no trouble getting back to the postseason. But since this year doesn’t look any different than any other year many fans are panicking earlier and don’t know who to blame.
We just have to keep hoping for the best and accept whatever comes along.
Bruce Siegel
I agree with other commenters, Jon. This is the personal, vulnerable, soul-searching, psychological sort of piece I used to enjoy so much on DodgerThoughts. I was worried that moving to the Dodgers’ payroll might make your writing more corporate (read: bland).
More like this one, please!
lsuzuki
Wonderful piece of writing, Jon. Love your “thinking out loud” pieces.