For all the caterwauling that accompanied this year’s Oscar vote, its deadline dilemmas and electronic exasperations, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences can be thankful it’s not Major League Baseball right now. …
For all the caterwauling that accompanied this year’s Oscar vote, its deadline dilemmas and electronic exasperations, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences can be thankful it’s not Major League Baseball right now. …
Previous
Next
Comments are closed.
What happens when three old friends in crisis fall into an unexpected love triangle? In The Catch, Maya, Henry and Daniel embark upon an emotional journey that forces them to confront unresolved pain, present-day traumas and powerful desires, leading them to question the very meaning of love and fulfillment. The Catch tells a tale of ordinary people seeking the extraordinary – or, if that’s asking too much, some damn peace of mind.
Brothers in Arms excerpt: Fernando Valenzuela
October 22, 2024
Catch ‘The Catch,’ the new novel by Jon Weisman!
November 1, 2023
A new beginning with the Dodgers
August 31, 2023
Fernando Valenzuela: Ranking the games that defined the legend
August 7, 2023
Interview: Ken Gurnick
on Ron Cey and writing
about the Dodgers
June 25, 2023
Thank You For Not ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
1991-2013
Dodgers at home: 1,028-812 (.558695)
When Jon attended: 338-267 (.558677)*
When Jon didn’t: 695-554 (.556)
* includes road games attended
2013
Dodgers at home: 51-35 (.593)
When Jon attended: 5-2 (.714)
When Jon didn’t: 46-33 (.582)
Note: I got so busy working for the Dodgers that in 2014, I stopped keeping track, much to my regret.
Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén
Anonymous
Every day I check to see if there is a new post here, Jon. I have thought of stopping doing so, but, thought you might post on the voting. Nice to hear from you.
Jon Weisman
Thanks, Mike.
Anonymous
Vote Them In:
Bonds
Clemens
McGwire
Sosa
Biggio
Welcom back Jon. Have a great 2013 season!
Jon Weisman
Thanks – you too!
Anonymous
Jonny Weisman……. great to see you on here on DT today.
I hit the little RSS every day to see if you’ve posted something…
Happy New Year to you and your family.
Anonymous
John I wish that you would start dodger thoughts up again. You are the best at this. I have tried to find another blog like this and I can’t. I wish you would just start dodger thoughts up again.
Anonymous
So true.
Anonymous
I do to, but my hat is off to Linkmeister with Elysian Fields.
Anonymous
A ray of sunshine on a cloudy winter day.
Anonymous
I knew you would come back even if just once in awhile. Good for you!!
Anonymous
Biggio would already be in if he could make that turning leaping Jeter thing.
He should be in anyway. Piazza too.
I think the voters are being extra cautious, not wanting to get burned if evidence comes out later against Piazza.
Michael Green
I’ll second Mike’s thanks to Jon for coming back here. My days aren’t the same without you! That said, I’ll agree up to a point. Bonds and Clemens clearly were Hall of Famers before they started or were accused of starting to use steroids. Piazza? I’m inclined the same way, even if he did. McGwire and Sosa, no–the numbers don’t add up otherwise. While you don’t have to be a big slugger to have benefited from PED’s–hello, Paul LoDuca–until and unless there’s proof that Craig Biggio did it, it is criminal that he became lumped in with this group.
Jon Weisman
New post up top.